Monday, March 30, 2015

Assistance Package 86a

The eighty-sixth entry continued the lies and errors and there were so many this has to be divided into four parts;

# Everything went as planned, and it was confirmed that I do actually believe in a cure and am not a poser or a hypocrite.
Belief in a cure is proof of posing and hypocrisy.

# Some NDs will call Jonathan Mitchell a human rights abuser, but he is not that at all and neither am I.
Yes the both of you are.

# He is simply a man with a disease called autism and he wants it cured.
Autism is not a disease.

# It would be no different if he wanted to cure cancer or AIDS.
Yes it is very different.

# To portray it as a different way of beng or a civil rights issue is not only dishonest but harmful
It is honest and therefore not harmful at all.

# Some NDs, such as Clay Adams and Phil Gluyas, believe that Jonathan's autism was caused by the refrigerator mom theory
There is no proof of this.

# That is a despicable way to try to discredit autism, especially with a theory that has been scientifically disproven.
It is not an attempt to discredit autism.

# It was actually Jonathan's writings, along with those of Jake Crosby, which turned me from ND to pro-cure nearly overnight.
There is evidence that this is not the case.

# I will never join neurodiversity again, because theye are evil people who are owned by Big Pharma.
Oliver is a member of neurodiversity. Every human being is.

# Ari Ne'eman invented neurodiversity in 2006, and they seek to ban curing autism.
He did not. The term was first coined in the late 1990's.

# We must stop that for the greater good.
The greater good is to silence those who want a cure for Autism, as it is impossible.

# Calling someone a bad mother simply because they tried to cure their son of a horrendous disease is essentially the same thing as calling them a refrigerator mother.
It is more certainly not the same thing.

# Once Jonathan's parents realized they weren't to blame for his autism, they were relieved and focused their energy on curing him and not themselves, and that's how it should be.
There is no proof that any such realization occurred.

# I completely agree with you about Phil. Good luck in winning that frivolous lawsuit he filed against you!
History shows that the lawsuit was not frivolous as it was successful.

# Just because a cure doesn't currently exist doesn't mean that it's undesirable.
A cure will never exist so it should not be desired.

# There is no cure for cancer or AIDS, but that doesn't stop us from hoping.
Those are diseases and therefore should have a cure.

# Some of the biomed treatments (GF/CF, chelation, etc.) Jonathan believes are ineffective.
It depends. There are instances where it has worked.

# I know I certainly am not, and in my opinion it is neurodiversity who demands pity as opposed to fixing themselves.
Oliver is opposed to fixing himself.

# I am aware that he now boycotts both Autism Speaks and the Autism Society of America due to their involvement with neurodiversity.
There is no proof of this.

# While I do believe in actually curing your disability instead of just demanding "respect" (a la neurodiversity)
Respect is a human right and should be demanded.

# People also do have the right to determine their own cure/treatment course.
Not when the "cure"/treatment doesn't work.

# They may have the right to decide against a cure in their case, but they do not have the right to force their views on others, portray a cure as "genocide," or make unreasonable demands as per their autism.
I am yet to see an unreasonable demand. A cure would indeed be genocide.

# They're already legally protected under the ADA, and they have no right to use their autism as an excuse simply because they oppose a cure.
The ADA is a useless law that is ineffective until the United States signs the relevant UN covenant.

# Even ND doesn't take Amanda Baggs seriously anymore.
There is no proof of this.

# It's good that we exposed her as a fraud, but now we must do the same with Ari Ne'eman.
Amanda Baggs is not a fraud and I believe she has a case for libel.

# I never knew that about Phil Gluyas (being sold as a child). That's really unfortunate, but it certainly explains why he's so fucked up.
There is no proof of this malicious accusation.

# My point was that if a cure is unattainable now, that doesn't mean in can't be in the future. The same is true with cancer and AIDS.
No it's not. Do not compare the conditions.

# Unfortunately, there are many who aren't able to do so, so a cure would help them greatly.
No, improved treatments and understanding will achieve that.

This assistance shall continue.

No comments:

Post a Comment